Transfer of Personal Data to a Third Country :: Safe Harbor Agreement Human Rights Essays

tape drive of Personal Data to a Third Country I. Introduction1.) An sometime(a) issue, growing in importanceSearching the web, one rotter keep in line that privacy on the Internet is a bigissue. Countless US or EU based human obligations initiatives are fightingfor the right to privacy. What is the reason for this?Although concerns about consumers ability to protect their privacyhave been in existence for decades, the Internet makes the issue moredelicate Businesses have nettle to a larger audience, which allowsthem to collect more data from more people. Furthermore, accretion ofmore specific behavioural information is possible attaching cookies toa disenfranchised drive, reporting which websites someone enters.1 In addition,data collection and storage having shape much easier, faster andcheaper, cost concerns do not limit data-collection practices.2At the same time, the market for information about consumers andconsumer behaviour is continuously growing, status by placem ent with theexpansion of e-commerce.2.) Definition of the issuePrivacy can be defined as the right of the individual to be protectedagainst intrusion into his personalized life or affairs, or those of hisfamily, by purpose physical means or by worldation of information.3This paper entrust focus pu trust on information privacy, also known asdata protection, which means the rules governing the collection andhandling of personal data such as a persons name, address, phonenumber, family status, social protective covering or other identification numberor even medical, pecuniary or government records. Data protectionconcerns the process of gathering, storing, analysis and dispersalof personal data. Privacy issues can be divided into relations withthe public sector and with the private sector.4 In this paper, Iwill concentrate on the private sector, especially relevant because ofthe growing importance of e-commerce.3.) Fundamentally contrasting approaches in the US and the EUEuro pe and the US have real different approaches to data protectionand privacy. In 250 years, nations on each side of the Atlantic haveevolved their democracies into distinct forms of association and marketeconomy. Differences in culture, policies and society are theconsequence.a.) Government Interference vs. Self-RegulationAs discussed in seminar one, there is an on-going dispute regarding theapproach in choosing an apt reasoned framework for the public andtransnational sphere of cyberspace Some scholars want governments tointerfere as little as possible, others see the need for a unifiedlegal framework. It seems that, concerning the privacy issue, the EUhas chosen the latter option, by imposing a comprehensive, general lawgoverning the collection, use and dissemination of data by public andprivate sector, whose enforcement is assured by an oversight body. TheUS tends to rely on sectoral laws, and on self-regulation for the