'The War of 1812\r'

'The fight of 1812: It’s Importance to the States The War of 1812 is probably our some obscure conflict. Although a expectant deal has been written close the struggle, the intermediate American is further vaguely aw atomic number 18 of wherefore we fought or who the enemy was. Even those who know something about the contest are likely to remember only a few dramatic mo man antecedentts, such as the writing of â€Å"The Star-Spangled Banner,” the burning of the land’s capital, or the Battle of New Orleans. Why is this contendfarefare so obscure? One reason is that no broad president is associated with the conflict.Although his enemies c each tolded it â€Å"Mr. Madisons War,” James Madison was shy and deferential, simply measuring up to such state of contend leading as Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, or Franklin Roosevelt. Moreover, the opera hat American generals in this war †Andrew Jackson, Jacob Brown, and Winfield Scott †were unable to turn the tide because all(prenominal) was confined to a one or cardinal theaters in a war that had s even so or eight theaters. No one like George Washington, Ulysses Grant, or Dwight Eisenhower emerged to put his stamp on the war and to conceptualise the nation to victory.Although these things are true though, the War of 1812 is the more or less important event for America, because it officially broke us as the United States of America apart from colossal Britain. Another reason for the obscurity of this war is that its causes are complex and slender understood today. Most scholars gibe that the war was fought over maritime issues, particularly the Orders in Council, which restricted American trade with the European Continent, and impressment, which was the over-embellished Navy’s practice of removing seamen from American merchandiser vessels.In contemporary parlance, the war was fought for â€Å"Free Trade and Sailors Rights. ” These issues come along arcane today. Moreover, the only way that the United States to discover at Great Britain was by attacking Canada, and that make it look like a war of territorial reserve aggression. Even today Canadians are likely to call the war in this light, and who can blame them? A war fought to secure maritime rights by trespassing(a) Canada strikes many people as curious. The prosecution of the war was marred by considerable bungling and mismanagement. This was partly due to the nature of the republic. The ation was too young and un seek †and its government too feeble and inexperienced †to go after a major war efficiently. Politics too vie a part. Federalists vigorously opposed the conflict, and so too did some Republicans. Even those who supported the war feuded among themselves and never displayed the sort of patriotic enthusiasm that has been so evident in other American wars. The advocates of war appeared to support the conflict much with their heads than their p atrol wagon, and more with their shopping malls than their purses. As a result, efforts to raise men and money lagged far behind need.Despite the bungling and half-hearted support that characterized this conflict, the War of 1812 was not without its stirring moments and splendid victories. American achiever at the Thames in the northboundwest, the victories at Chippewa and Fort Erie on the Niagara front, the rousing defense of Baltimore in the Chesapeake, and the crushing vote out of the British at New Orleans †all these showed that with proper leadership and training American battle men could hold their own against the well-drilled and battle-hardened regulars of Great Britain.Similarly, the oceanic victories on the northern lakes and the high seas and the success of privateers close to the globe demonstrated that, given the right odds, the nation’s armed ships matched up well against even the vaunted and seemingly invincible Mistress of the Seas. The war simila rly produced its share of heroesâ€people whose reputations were enhanced by multitude or government service. The war helped catapult quadruplet men into the presidency †Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, James Monroe, and William total heat Harrison †and three men into the vice-presidency †Daniel D.Tompkins, John C. Calhoun, and Richard M. Johnson. The war in addition gave a significant boost to the political or military careers of other men. Indeed, for many young men on the make, the war offered an excellent launching fill in for a career. In some ways, the War of 1812 looked more to the past than to the future. As Americas second and shoemakers last war against Great Britain, it echoed the ideology and issues of the American Revolution. It was the second and last time that America was the underdog in a war and the second and last time that the nation tried to conquer Canada.It was also the last time that Indians played a major role in find the future of t he continent. In this sense, the War of 1812 was the last of the North American colonial wars. The war was unusual in generating such vehement political opposition and most unique in ending in a stalemate on the battlefield. Although most Americans pretended they had won the war †even calling it a â€Å" stake War of Independence”â€they could point to few concrete gains †certainly none in the peace accord †to sustain this claim. It is this lack of success that may best explain why the war is so little remembered.Americans have characteristically judged their wars on the basis of their success. The known wars †the Revolution, the Civil War, and World War II †were all clear-cut successes. Although many people remembered the War of 1812 as a success, it was in a very tangible sense a failure, and perhaps this is why it attracts so little attention today. The obscurity of this war, however, should not contrivance us to its significance, for it was an important turning point, a great watershed, in the history of the young republic.It concluded close a quarter of a century of roiled diplomacy and partisan politics and ushered in the time of Good Feelings. It marked the end of the Federalist party barely the vindication of Federalist policies, many of which were adopted by Republicans during or after the war. The war also broke the power of American Indians and reinforced the powerful undercurrent of Anglophobia that had been spawned by the Revolution a generation before.In addition, it promoted national authority and encouraged the heady expansionism that lay at the heart of American foreign policy for the rest of the century. Finally, the war gave the fledgling republic a host of sayings, symbols, and songs that helped Americans furbish up who they were and where their young republic was headed. Although looking to the past, the war was fraught with consequences for the future, and for this reason it is worth studying today, and that is why it is the most important event for America.\r\n'