'Filipino People and Rizal Essay\r'

'Introduction: During Rizal’s conviction, he showed us what a real ac doledgment of a muliebrity is on those time. He told in cardinal of his letter that from his infancy adult female ar with consonant manners, beautiful ways, and modest demeanor. But he similarly told us that at that place was in tot onlyy in all told an in confinesixture of servitude and deference to the words or whims of their so-called â€Å" eldritch fathers”, due to excessive kindness, modesty, or perhaps ignorance. They waited faint-hearted plants s ingest and re ard in darkness. The charr of Rizal’s time responded to the first appeal in the interest of the upbeat of the race.\r\nRizal said: right away that you give set an manakin to those who, like you, long to earn their eyes subject and be delivered from servitude, new hopes be awakened in us and we now even d atomic number 18 to brass adversity, because we carry you for our allies and ar confident of victory . This term paper exit discuss what are the soulfulnessity of Filipina from the historic and the women indistinguishability today. The significance of woman from the startgoing who followed Rizal’s bra rattling to compete for their right and their roughages, will also try to see what kind of woman individuation should a Philippine have, the Filipino women in Rizal’s novel or some of our woman leaders of todays.\r\nWhat is a Filipina? Is she Asian or occidental? Is she the reluctant leader Corazon Aquino, or is she the self-proclaimed â€Å"symbol of watcher for her people” Imelda Marcos? Is she the modern-day Gabriela Silang who envisions and ferments towards cross-sectoral changes, or is she iodin of the millions of faceless and nameless struggling multitude who does anything bonny to put option rice on the tcap fitting, the ordinary Juana de la Cruz?\r\nThe implication of an early paradigm of gender fount and equality whitethorn have, to some extent, begun the process of identity operator ecesis. On the surface, the Filipino myth does not seem to introduce the conceit of conflict. What is projected is compatibility and harmony. Just when and how, then, did the problems of identity conflict for the Philippine woman come about(predicate)? The language of the colonizer is found to not tho serve as a vehicle for literary expression, barely also for setting forth the regard date of a Filipina from a male perspective.\r\nA brief glance at literature shows an organic evolution of sorts of the Filipina from the pre-colonial Maganda of endemical folklore, to the early 1800s Laura who epitomizes beauty and faithful credence of her role as prescribed by culture, religion, and rules of order; and to the fictional sheathization of womanhood drawn from devil progress tos of historical fiction by Jose Rizal, Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo. Although Rizal’s central protagonists in both novels are men, the si gnificance of the women characters lies in their symbolic portrayals of a people of many personas, of a country torn by by race, culture, and class.\r\nIn Rizal’s attempt to do a nation’s identity by addressing the need for field reforms and by exposing the evils of colonialism, he whitethorn have also encouraged the need to clarify the Filipina. The colonial Spanish period’s desire moving picture of a Filipina is embodied in the character of female horse Claraâ€beautiful, demure, modest, patient, devoutly religious, cultured, submissive, and virginal. The blood that runs through her veins is much atomic number 63an than native. Her ancestry is noted since it has a military capability on the idealized model of a Filipina, the roman letters Catholic’s Virgin bloody shame, and European and foreign.\r\n mare Clara belongs to the elite; her kindness is not to be equated, however, with genial awareness. She is a repressed woman and her weakness and hopelessness over a lost love over cause her, enabling powerful and sinister forces to slowly conduct her to expiry. Perhaps, to a certain degree, this â€Å"ideal” is all the same upheld today, change to the confusion of identity system, for the original application of the character â€Å"Filipino” was only for Spaniards and their descendants who lived on the islands; the indigenous natives were simply called â€Å"indios.\r\n” The 19th century saw a character reversal process: the last mentioned (â€Å"indios”) who have capitulated, are now called â€Å"Filipinos” while the former, mostly require descendants of colonizers, now prefer to call them â€Å"Spanish. ” The character Dona Victorina is a reflection of the triumph of colonialismâ€the alteration of air and thinking patterned after the character’s perception of a superior race. unity one hundred years ago, there was a Dona Victorina. Today, the trappings of a colonial mindset persist, and are expressed in the attraction to look western and to consume Western goods.\r\nDona Victorina is a characterization of lost identity. Her frivolity, and that of Paulita Gomez, who is greatly capture by the trappings of the elite, who loves the man who could maintain the of necessity of her class, and who is a vain and flighty version of maria Clara, may be seen today in the trope of Imelda Marcos. The likes of Imelda Marcos also mirror, ironically, an new(prenominal) Rizal character, Dona Consolacion, who can be set forth as an interesting specimen of colonial deformation. She may serve as an ex axerophtholle of â€Å"the dehumanization of the indio,” a case of total alienation from her original self, or from her potential self.\r\nThe character Sisa also represents the opposite image of Paulita, a contradiction of the so-called high perspective and the liberated label describing the Filipino women today. She is the woman Mary Hollenstei ner speaks of in her article, â€Å"The Wife”: quietly suffering from subjugation, sacrificing to put nutriment on the table, living only for her sons. Sisa represents the unsounded victims of an oppression which drove her to madness and destruction.\r\nThere are millions of Sisas in the Philippines today: the unfortunate women who are scavenging for food in the mountains of trash, the degraded women whose bodies are used as commodities, and the squalld wives who are repeatedly beaten by their husbands. The opposite woman, Juli, emerges as the one character that chooses death over a life in shame. She suffers abuse and humiliation working as a consideration to carry her family’s debt. She brings to mind the women of today who work for starvation wages.\r\nJuli refuses to be coerced; her death liberates her from oppression. Among these characters, perhaps Juli shell characterizes a sense of purpose and identity. In Rizal’s characters, the women who seem t o be able to obtain their desire needs no matter the consequences are Dona Victorina, Paulita Gomez, and Dona Consolacion. On the other hand, misfortune seems to be the fate of the women whose brain could be raised to levels higher than that of self- give way. The all-giving attitude of Maria Clara, Sisa, and Juli leads them to their deaths.\r\nWithin their loving strata, each character is confronted with change degrees of oppression which in turn defines the parameters of liberation. In their pipe dream to hold on to the symbols of the ruling class, the former conclave has made themselves seemingly strong and highly visible handmaidens of a system which feeds on varying levels of compulsion and subjugation. The latter group’s retreat into death or madness carries two concurrent views: 1) the competency to exercise a final liberation as a form of defiance to oppression, and 2) the weakness and unfitness to confront any form of in barelyice.\r\nWho is more than crush? Who has in truth liberated herself? Perhaps, what we are seeing is the notion that oppression has slowed down the process towards a content identity in general and towards a Filipina identity in particular. The reality is that the Philippines is a country facilitate going through the throes of colonization. Indeed, there are those who have catapulted to the highest ranks, such as Corazon Aquino and Imelda Marcos, who embody differences in substance, style, and character. However, there are contradictions.\r\nCorazon Aquino’s high visibility, status, and power contradicts the image of a meek and subservient wife true to the memory of her husband; while Imelda Marcos, the â€Å"Iron coquet” of unparalleled extravagance, is a drastic contrast to the image of a once dutiful and subservient wife. notwithstandstilling the fact that both overcame the traditional roles assigned to women of their friendly class by reaching positions of political power, they perch subse rvient to the memories of their husbands, nevertheless exemplify the interests of the class they represent.\r\n kinsfolk interest is perhaps the overriding difference amongst highly visible women, such as Corazon Aquino and Imelda Marcos, and the glowing activistic women carrying the legacy of an intellectualized Gabriela Silang. While women in power and women working for empowerment both assert a heritage and demand a platform, the contradiction in all probability lies in the former’s subservience and the latter’s ability to address issues that cut across class lines.\r\nBut class again diametrically separates political women from those who suffer in silence, such as the patient and self-sacrificing women who toil to feed their families, work in sweat shops, as vendors, scavengers, and prostitutes. There are also those who come faceless and nameless for they may flit and slide and go seemingly where the perfume blows, all these, indeed a kaleidoscope of conflic ting Filipina identities.\r\nnot only do Rizal’s novels provide a matrix for identity and conflict, they also allow a rare view of a people’s past which formed their culture today, and of a social cancer of which, up to the present, â€Å"the best cure” is still to be found. In the process of identity formation or perpetuation of identity conflict, the women in Rizal’s novels best serve as bridges in the development process, allowing the flow from the early 1800s mythical formation to the current emerging identity.\r\nThe social, cultural and political setting of both past and present are reflect in the novels. The myth of the â€Å"high status” of the Filipina has caused Philippine women, wittingly or unwittingly, to become at times participants in their own oppression. This â€Å"containment by elevation” has allowed the sum of money of womanhood to be subjected to and dictated by rules and regulations theorise by and for the satisfact ion of a colonial auberge. Philippine women find themselves attempting to wade out of a morass of confusion over their identity.\r\nRemembrance of Rizal is fast disappearing when it ought to be cherished and honored by all Filipinos. It was he who, more effectively than anyone else among his compatriots, unified the disparate inhabitants of our archipelago into one nation. It was he who made them share a common rage against the foreign intruder and a common aspiration for the freedom of their land. Rizal awakened the issue conscience from its lethargy not through the force of weapons system but with the armies of his pen.\r\nThese were the â€Å"Noli” and â€Å"El Filibusterismo,” his â€Å"Letter to the Women of Malolos,” his new-fangled poems for the Motherland, his â€Å"Mi Ultimo Adios” that he secreted in a lamp in Fort Santiago hours before his death, and other irrefutable accusations against the Spaniards. His words were like mighty legions th at win for our country the freedom we now enjoy. Summary As we all see, that woman of today are very different from the past. Filipino women today are hold out and strong enough just like Rizal to fight for what they think is right.\r\nThere also some women from the past who fight for their rights like fostering but as compare today woman are more confident to stand. There are woman activist who really do what a Filipino woman can do to make a stand for their fellow ugly Filipino people peculiarly those people who are uneducated, they take everything to achieve their goals. Nowadays, we are now equal with man in more or less everything most especially in terms of direction, all people in our country, man and woman, rich and poor are now equal in acquiring education.\r\nBecause of it we are now challenge to face the unfavorable circumstances and cut acrossd to fight for changes, not just to limit our roles as housewives but also to continue fighting for what is right, and th at’s what a real Filipino woman identity today. Just like Rizal, he focused on self-improvement, showing to Spain and the rest of the foreign community that, given the opportunity to achieve their dependable potential, Filipinos could stand alongside the best in the valet and were eligible for self-rule.\r\nThen he set out to apply what he had learned as an ophthalmologist, providing a basic service that was badly needed by his impoverished compatriots. In his writings he accentuate the importance of education, seeing it as the path to national progress rather than armed revolt. We all know that prudence does not consist in blindly obeying any whim of the little tin God, but in obeying only that which is reasonable and just, because blind respect is itself the cause and origin of those whims, and those guilty of it are really to be blamed.\r\nRizal said that God gave each individual reason and a will of his or her own to distinguish the just and the unjust, all were born without shackles and free, and zip has a right to subjugate the will and the opinion of another. I hope we can revive the respectful sentiments of gratitude to him for his efforts in releasing us from foreign bondage. political rhetoric is not enough to keep his courage alive. Let us remember that he forsook the enticements of his youthful and gifted life and embraced instead the ultimate sacrifice for the welfare of his country.\r\nThat is the best homage we can pay the greatest hero of our race. Conclusion The issue of racial equality is today hardly disputed in intellectual circles. During Rizal’s time, however, the claim that â€Å"all races are essentially equal” was a highly debated matter among anthropologists, biologists, and philosophers. The readers of his novels, essays, and letters are familiar with his portrayal and imprecation of Spanish colonial rule.\r\nHis insistence on the education of the native Indios, the representation of the Philippines in the Cortes Generales, and more so the recognition of the civil rights of the Filipino are all based on the belief that there are neither â€Å"essentially” superior nor â€Å"essentially” indifferent races. In this belief stems the conviction that his fellow Filipinos had the qualification for autonomy and enlightenment. The present Filipino youth essential know that in order to make their strawman felt, they must understand Rizal.\r\nTo understand Rizal, they must have the constitution and motivation to do so. Without such spirit or motivation, they will never be able to understand Rizal’s objectives or even the other heroes who fought for equality and freedom for the sake of the Fatherland. I think that the Filipino youth will be able to move the society through these implied teachings of Jose Rizal that will fritter away a new love to the Filipino Hero, I admit that I only considered Rizal’s conduct and Works as another general education subjec t that is needed to be taken.\r\nBut what I get is more than just knowing Rizal, but also knowing my Filipino identity and that I must fight at all follow to defend my identity. A lot of what Rizal had dreamed of has now come true for many people in the state. He was already a modern democrat when he advocated participation in the state and society with education. Today, education is no longer a permit among the small elite, for everybody’s participation in all public matters has become a right and duty. ”\r\nOne’s right to express him or her in all matters is founded on compulsory education with the required quality standards. References: Jose Rizal’s Writings in Europe and its message to the Filipino Youth Today Zaide, Gregorio F. & Zaide, Sonia M. 1998. Jose Rizal: Life, Works and Writings of a Genius, Writer, Scientist and theme Hero. Capino, Gonzales and Pineda: Rizal’s life, works and writings:their impact on our National identity Colo nization: It’s Impact on Self-Image Philippine Women in Rizal’s Novels and Today By Linda Acupanda McGloin.\r\n'